| To: | Rémi Guyomarch <rguyom@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IP aliases not sticking around |
| From: | Mohammad Rizal Othman <rizal@mimos.my> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:58:37 +0800 |
| Cc: | rforsythe@centerone.com, chris@upnix.com, misc@openbsd.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20020228085633.D2420@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net> |
| Organization: | MIMOS Berhad |
| References: | <200202280640.g1S6e2Y5017642@saddlebags.upnix.net> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202280016400.15843-100000@blue.centerone.com> <20020228153948.5f627a83.rizal@mimos.my> <20020228085633.D2420@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net> |
| Sender: | owner-misc@openbsd.org |
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:56:33 +0100 Rémi Guyomarch <rguyom@pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:39:48PM +0800, Mohammad Rizal Othman > wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 00:17:33 -0700 (MST) > > Ralph Forsythe <rforsythe@centerone.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes ... That isn't what the FAQ suggested. Try this: > > > > > > inet 209.82.111.158 255.255.255.240 NONE media autoselect > > > inet alias 66.46.111.238 255.255.255.240 > > > > > > > I think this should be > > > > inet 209.82.111.158 255.255.255.240 NONE media autoselect > > inet alias 66.46.111.238 255.255.255.255 > > Aliases on the same sub-network as the main IP should have a netmask > of 255.255.255.255, but I don't think this restriction holds for > aliases on other sub-networks. > Yes you're right. Didn't notice the IPs are different. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IP aliases not sticking around, Rémi Guyomarch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: gcc for openbsd??, Brian J. Kifiak |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IP aliases not sticking around, Rémi Guyomarch |
| Next by Thread: | gcc for openbsd??, Max OpenBSD |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |