| To: | ports@openbsd.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: DJB slashpackage |
| From: | Han <han@mijncomputer.nl> |
| Date: | Sun, 5 Aug 2001 23:43:18 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108051741560.31153-100000@saitti.net> |
| Mail-followup-to: | ports@openbsd.org |
| References: | <Pine.BSO.4.21.0108051740530.30733-100000@sinus.sentia> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108051741560.31153-100000@saitti.net> |
| Sender: | owner-ports@openbsd.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.20i |
Heikki Korpela (heko@iki.fi) wrote: > Some options that first come into mind: > 1) mark such ports as something like > BROKEN="Please download and install these ports by yourself, they > don't fit into our ports system any more" > 2) make the ports interactive and warn the user sufficiently about > the slashpackage issue > 3) hack and patch the slashpackage issues away > OpenBSD can't distribute binaries of daemontools in any case, so I > think 1) or 2) wouldn't be much an issue. Well maybe just like vim-stable and vim-snapshot, but then: daemontools-oldfashioned daemontools-slashpackage I mean the old packages aren't broken or something. cya, Han. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: DJB slashpackage, Morten Liebach |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [seb: rxvt setuid documentation], Brad |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: DJB slashpackage, Morten Liebach |
| Next by Thread: | Re: DJB slashpackage, David Lebel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |