openbsd-ports
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DJB slashpackage

To: Camiel Dobbelaar <cd@sentia.nl>
Subject: Re: DJB slashpackage
From: David Lebel <lebel@lebel.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 22:59:45 -0401
Cc: Heikki Korpela <heko@iki.fi>, ports@openbsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0108051657470.30733-100000@sinus.sentia>; from cd@sentia.nl on Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 05:19:53PM +0200
Organization: None whatsover.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108051540340.28702-100000@saitti.net> <Pine.BSO.4.21.0108051657470.30733-100000@sinus.sentia>
Sender: owner-ports@openbsd.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Quoting Camiel Dobbelaar (cd@sentia.nl):
> So the question remains:  should we keep trying to squeeze it into our
> ports system or just drop the DJB (/package) ports?

well, there is a loophole in

http://cr.yp.to/slashpackage/management.html

where it says "as well as in /usr/local/bin for compatibility" when
talking about the location of symlinks so people can still execute
binaries.

So, under a "slashpackage" system, one is assumed to litter
/usr/local/bin with symlinks to allow "brain-damaged" (in Dan's eye)
software to find the actual binaries.

So, if we leave the software in /usr/local/bin, we could argue that we
are trying to be "compatible" with OpenBSD.

This should cover most djb packages in our tree.

Ciao,
  ...David
 
 
-- 
// david lebel <lebel@{lebel.org,nobiaze.com,openbsd.org}> //
// http://www.lebel.org/           http://www.nobiaze.com/ //
// pgp: 3633 6999 D47E 73ED 099F  4341 08A4 8E48 EF56 61D1 //

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>