There are a couple of problems that I see from glance:
- the pkg/COMMENT is obsolete, now we put COMMENT lines in the
Makefiles. I am actually surprised that you have done it that
way - what OpenBSD version do you have and how do you update your
ports tree? This doesn't not even work in -current since backwards
compatibility has been removed.
- packages have to have a version number. PKGNAME has to be in the form
of package-version, where 'version' should start with a digit. If there
is no version number provided with netburst, I suggest you put the date
timestamp, i.e. netburst-20010101
- gcc -g -DDEBUG -m486 -c list.c
cc1: Invalid option `486'
Obviously, this is unacceptable. Generally, ports should not be
i386-specific. the -m486 optimization flag should not be hardcoded in
the program, patch it if you have to. Additionally, it is good when it
obeys CFLAGS
- patches/patch-aa -- patches' names generally have to follow a certain
pattern. This is taken care of by update-patches automatically, which
generates patches very easily.
I think you have to update your ports tree and see how things are done
nowadays, then go back to this and read carefully the porting
documentation. Especially see www.openbsd.org/checklist.html after you
think you've done everything.
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:01:46 +0200
> From: Vladimir Kotal <vladya@openbsd.cz>
> To: ports@openbsd.org
> Cc: tqbf@pobox.com
> Subject: new net/netburst port
> Message-ID: <20010810140146.C22476@openbsd.cz>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I did easy port of Thomas Ptacek's netburst, which is 'fast IP scanner
> with a flexible range-specification syntax'. (originally at
> http://www.sockpuppet.org/tqbf/goodies.html)
>
> I find it very usefull and actually use it very frequently. Some can find
> it more suitable than 'sumo' nmap pkg.
>
> It can be found at:
> http://wilbury.sk/~techie/public/netburst-port.tgz
>
>
> v.
|