| To: | "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail? |
| From: | Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:17:16 -0600 |
| Cc: | ports@openbsd.org |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "28 Aug 2001 05:23:52 -0000." <20010828052352.26132.qmail@cr.yp.to> |
| Sender: | owner-ports@openbsd.org |
> It has been provided for years as a port. It has even been provided as a > package on several of the CD-ROMs. Why haven't you been objecting to it? No it has never been on the CD. The most restrictive source or binary license on the CD is the GPL. I don't think vim or pine or pico made it on either, since their licenses have tiny restrictions. > Hypocrite. > > ---Dan > Why do you sign your email twice? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, D. J. Bernstein |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | MAILER-DAEMON@muncher.math.uic.edu: failure notice, Theo de Raadt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, D. J. Bernstein |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Jonathan Walther |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |