I guess the argument is over. Hurray!
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON
Delivery-Date: Tue Aug 28 00:17:30 2001
Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (muncher.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.181])
by cvs.openbsd.org (8.11.6/8.10.1) with SMTP id f7S6HSS14436
for <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:17:28 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200108280617.f7S6HSS14436@cvs.openbsd.org>
Received: (qmail 19023 invoked for bounce); 28 Aug 2001 06:15:30 -0000
Date: 28 Aug 2001 06:15:30 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@muncher.math.uic.edu
To: deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at muncher.math.uic.edu.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<djb-internal/copies@muncher.math.uic.edu>:
See http://cr.yp.to/docs/copies.html.
- --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
Received: (qmail 32604 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Aug 2001 06:15:29 -0000
Delivered-To: djb@cr.yp.to
Received: (qmail 7501 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2001 06:15:24 -0000
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (root@199.185.137.3)
by muncher.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 28 Aug 2001 06:15:24 -0000
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (deraadt@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cvs.openbsd.org (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7S6HGS14330;
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:17:16 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200108280617.f7S6HGS14330@cvs.openbsd.org>
To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
cc: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?
In-reply-to: Your message of "28 Aug 2001 05:23:52 -0000."
<20010828052352.26132.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:17:16 -0600
From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
> It has been provided for years as a port. It has even been provided as a
> package on several of the CD-ROMs. Why haven't you been objecting to it?
No it has never been on the CD. The most restrictive source or binary
license on the CD is the GPL. I don't think vim or pine or pico made
it on either, since their licenses have tiny restrictions.
> Hypocrite.
>
> ---Dan
>
Why do you sign your email twice?
------- End of Forwarded Message
|