openbsd-ports
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?

To: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?
From: Jonathan Walther <krooger@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>, <ports@openbsd.org>
In-reply-to: <200108280617.f7S6HGS14330@cvs.openbsd.org>
Sender: owner-ports@openbsd.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In that case, as a user concerned with freedom, and my ability
to use OpenBSD in certain embedded systems I'm working on, I'd
like to request the removal of vim, pine and pico from the ports
tree.  They are no more useful to me than qmail is.

Jonathan

On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> No it has never been on the CD.  The most restrictive source or binary
> license on the CD is the GPL.  I don't think vim or pine or pico made
> it on either, since their licenses have tiny restrictions.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBO4syKsK9HT/YfGeBAQFWogQAj8qlnZfBx0sBuI+vOTAx4pJZND6WIISu
O9DaBxh1ssxXyYRoI7Pc2O6La/4B84pA8OBZQ1NbGI5Lb9XHhrF8WAhxi3r672nX
ZdedEMswsVMT1cI8OEGBJMYgHDOPdJCVJBBL6oel01NXB/EJP4A2Bkfkd17F1/uh
Q9GMNMwrTNg=
=PO9y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>