| To: | ports@openbsd.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail? |
| From: | Marc Espie <espie@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:48:56 +0200 |
| Cc: | "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010827235304.14357.qmail@cr.yp.to>; from djb@cr.yp.to on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:53:04PM -0000 |
| Mail-followup-to: | ports@openbsd.org, "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> |
| References: | <010d01c12cc6$788da4e0$1601a8c0@andrey> <200108241811.f7OIB0S04608@cvs.openbsd.org> <20010827235304.14357.qmail@cr.yp.to> |
| Reply-to: | Marc.Espie@liafa.jussieu.fr |
| Sender: | owner-ports@openbsd.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:53:04PM -0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > Theo de Raadt writes: > > That code has never been free. > > When are you going to stop shipping Netscape 4? Hypocrite. Check your facts, you'll look like less of an idiot. Netscape4 is explicitly marked as non-redistributable in the ports. (All PERMIT_PACKAGES are set to no) Precisely because we read the software licence and followed it. On the other hand, you set very explicit restrictions that we obviously can't possibly meet. Remove those restrictions, write something that looks like a real licence, and answer licence-related questions in your email and you'll the djb-tools come back to the ports collection. In fact, why don't you just use the BSD licence ? because it's used by your personal enemies ? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Jonathan Walther |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: most ports packages problem in make install, Marc Espie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Marc Espie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Marc Espie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |