| To: | ports@openbsd.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail? |
| From: | "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> |
| Date: | 28 Aug 2001 16:50:21 -0000 |
| Automatic-legal-notices: | Copyright 2001, D. J. Bernstein. My transmission of this message to you does not constitute a copyright waiver or any other limitation of my rights, even if you have told me otherwise. |
| Mail-followup-to: | ports@openbsd.org |
| References: | <010d01c12cc6$788da4e0$1601a8c0@andrey> <200108241811.f7OIB0S04608@cvs.openbsd.org> <20010827235304.14357.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20010828094856.A24249@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> |
| Sender: | owner-ports@openbsd.org |
Marc Espie writes: > Netscape4 is explicitly marked as non-redistributable in the ports. > (All PERMIT_PACKAGES are set to no) I have an OpenBSD navigator-4.61.tgz package from more than a year ago. I checked ftp.openbsd.org yesterday, and it was still there. Why have you been distributing Netscape 4 packages? Why have you been including Netscape 4 in the ports? Hypocrite. > On the other hand, you set very explicit restrictions that we obviously > can't possibly meet. Liar. All you have to do is stop trying to screw around with the package. Many other distributors---those that consider user happiness more important than control---are following the rules. > In fact, why don't you just use the BSD licence ? http://cr.yp.to/compatibility.html ---Dan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: JDK 1.2-blackdown Port, Heikki Korpela |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Couderc Damien |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Marc Espie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Couderc Damien |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |