| To: | Jonathan Walther <krooger@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail? |
| From: | Tobias Weingartner <weingart@natasha.tepid.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:45:34 -0600 |
| Cc: | Heikki Korpela <heko@iki.fi>, OpenBSD ports-related discussion <ports@openbsd.org> |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Jonathan Walther <krooger@debian.org> of "Tue, 28 Aug 2001 08:58:13 PDT." <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108280852510.13460-100000@localhost> |
| Sender: | owner-ports@openbsd.org |
On Tuesday, August 28, Jonathan Walther wrote: > > In that case, why don't we standardize on his daemontools and ucspi-tcp > package? It would one-up us over the NetBSD folks with their shiny > new "rc.d" toy, and everyone would love a setup that finally got rid > of inetd.conf for something more flexible and secure. I'd be willing > to modify apache to work with daemontools svc. Surely you jest? --Toby. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Tobias Weingartner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Gordon Grieder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Heikki Korpela |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Kevin Sindhu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |