| To: | ports@openbsd.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail? |
| From: | David Terrell <dbt@meat.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:40:01 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <20010828165021.14430.qmail@cr.yp.to>; from djb@cr.yp.to on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:50:21PM -0000 |
| Mail-followup-to: | David Terrell <dbt@meat.net>, ports@openbsd.org |
| References: | <010d01c12cc6$788da4e0$1601a8c0@andrey> <200108241811.f7OIB0S04608@cvs.openbsd.org> <20010827235304.14357.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20010828094856.A24249@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20010828165021.14430.qmail@cr.yp.to> |
| Reply-to: | David Terrell <dbt@meat.net> |
| Sender: | owner-ports@openbsd.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.4i |
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:50:21PM -0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > http://cr.yp.to/compatibility.html Except, dan, the entire universe has standardized on /usr/local for addons and /usr for base components except you. A package being consistant across platforms is nice, but packages being consistant on a single platform is also nice. OpenBSD had a choice, made it. Live with it. Let's face it, you really don't want people who can't figure out how to compile qmail to use it anyway, do you? -- David Terrell | "If I had a nickel for every time I've seen a Usenet poster Nebcorp PM | slip in an ostensibly casual reference to how much smarter dbt@meat.net | he/she is than everyone else... why, I'd be able to throw a wwn.nebcorp.com |party for all my Mensa buddies!" -- Miguel Cruz |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Kevin Sindhu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Theo de Raadt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Gordon Grieder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, D. J. Bernstein |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |