openbsd-ports
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?

To: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
Date: 28 Aug 2001 23:16:52 -0000
Automatic-legal-notices: Copyright 2001, D. J. Bernstein. My transmission of this message to you does not constitute a copyright waiver or any other limitation of my rights, even if you have told me otherwise.
Mail-followup-to: ports@openbsd.org
References: <010d01c12cc6$788da4e0$1601a8c0@andrey> <200108241811.f7OIB0S04608@cvs.openbsd.org> <20010827235304.14357.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20010828094856.A24249@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20010828165021.14430.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20010828114001.B20868@pianosa.catch22.org>
Sender: owner-ports@openbsd.org
David Terrell writes:
> Except, dan, the entire universe has standardized on /usr/local for 
> addons and /usr for base components except you.

Wrong. Ever heard of Linux? Locally compiled add-on packages go into
/usr/local, but precompiled add-on packages go into /usr, except, of
course, when they go into /opt.

All of these non-constant splits cause serious problems for users. See
http://cr.yp.to/slashpackage/studies.html for several examples.

> Let's face it, you really don't want people who can't figure out how
> to compile qmail to use it anyway, do you?

Precompiled packages reduce installation latency.

---Dan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>