openbsd-ports
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?

To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>, <ports@openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:49:32 +0100
Organization: Knowtion Ltd
References: <010d01c12cc6$788da4e0$1601a8c0@andrey> <200108241811.f7OIB0S04608@cvs.openbsd.org> <20010827235304.14357.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20010828094856.A24249@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20010828165021.14430.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Sender: owner-ports@openbsd.org
> Liar. All you have to do is stop trying to screw around with the
> package. Many other distributors---those that consider user happiness
> more important than control---are following the rules.

I can't comment on the correctness or otherwise of the first statement above,
but on the later statements regarding the packaging; I like the current
directory layout, I administer more than just some DNS tools and I want to be
able to fit applications *into* my OS, not visa versa.

I still hate the way Oracle (for one example) takes over a whole machine, when
for many applications it will only be one of many running on a system.

If you expect your tools to help 'take over' systems by imposing external
'standards' on them, then you will lose. At least in my shop.

Peter


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>