| To: | ports@openbsd.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail? |
| From: | David Terrell <dbt@meat.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:46:19 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <20010829182326.6046.qmail@cr.yp.to>; from djb@cr.yp.to on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 06:23:26PM -0000 |
| Mail-followup-to: | David Terrell <dbt@meat.net>, ports@openbsd.org |
| References: | <djb@cr.yp.to> <12150.999042162@natasha.tepid.org> <20010829022956.27478.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20010829094214.K48@tika.solstaden.arnholm.nu> <20010829182326.6046.qmail@cr.yp.to> |
| Reply-to: | David Terrell <dbt@meat.net> |
| Sender: | owner-ports@openbsd.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.4i |
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 06:23:26PM -0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > Anders Arnholm writes: > > Program should use the interfaces toward the resolver and > > not /etc/resolv.conf. > > Please explain how a DHCP client can edit /etc/resolv.conf using ``the > interfaces toward the resolver.'' > > After that we'll discuss /dev/null and /bin/sh. Which I'm sure you'll be glad to tell us should actually be /fellate/djb and /lick/butt, for "standardization". After all, some linux systems ship bash as /bin/sh, so we'd better come up with a completely new path to avoid confusion and promote standardization! -- David Terrell | But remember that "layman" is just a polite dbt@meat.net | word for "idiot." http://wwn.nebcorp.com/ | - Neal Stephenson |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, D. J. Bernstein |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | licq 1.0.3, methodic |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, D. J. Bernstein |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why were all DJB's ports removed? No more qmail?, Anders |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |