openbsd-ports
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: licq 1.0.3

To: Heikki Korpela <heko@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: licq 1.0.3
From: Tony Lambiris <methodic@slartibartfast.angrypacket.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:12:12 -0700
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108292200550.23810-100000@saitti.net>; from heko@iki.fi on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:01:51PM +0300
References: <20010829115003.A14009@slartibartfast.angrypacket.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108292200550.23810-100000@saitti.net>
Sender: owner-ports@openbsd.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
If GTK is defined, I would simply add gtk+licq to LIB_DEPENDS. Im not
sure what I should do with qt.. I honestly dont think it should become a
seperate port (which is why I have QT defined by default), so I guess I
would have to go into the plugins directory of the licq tarball and
compile/install it. The only problem is pkg/PLIST would have to
dynamically be modified.

Can anyone think of a better way?

On 08.29.01, Heikki Korpela <heko@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, methodic wrote:
> 
> > FLAVORS=    qt_gui gtk_gui
> > FLAVOR?=    qt_gui
> 
> This is superior. Marking ports interactive should
> be avoided.
> 
> What would the corresponding actions you have for those
> flavors be?
> 

-- 
Tony Lambiris [methodic@slartibartfast.angrypacket.com]
   http://www.openbsd.org && http://www.openssh.com
       "Anyone who truly understands the power 
         of UNIX wouldn't use anything else."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>