I think this is the better route myself.
Another thing.. it doesnt look like gtk+licq 0.51 will be very friendly
with OpenBSD.. I got a bunch of errors (if you wish to see them,
download the tarball and run configure), so I instead retrieved 0.50,
which after a few file changes and patches, was able to successfully
compile. This shouldnt cause a problem with licq 1.0.3 (because it was
designed for 1.0.2). Im going to test it in a few minutes.
What would be a good way to go about either the qt plugin, or gtk
plugin? Can anyone name a port off the top of their head that has a
similar situation that I can reference to make sure Im doing this the
"right" way?
TIA
On 08.29.01, Brad <brad@comstyle.com> wrote:
> IMO I think what's mentioned here is the best route.
>
> Flavors are a pain in this situation because you have to then de-install
> the Licq port to switch between GUI modules. Sub-packages are a pain
> because you then compile both sub-packages which requires Gtk/Qt even
> though you're most likely only going to use one of the sub-packages.
>
> // Brad
>
> brad@comstyle.com
> brad@openbsd.org
>
> >methodic (methodic@slartibartfast.angrypacket.com) wrote:
> >
> >> [snip] By default, licq doesnt build a GUI.[snip] How do you guys
> >> think this should be done?
> >
> >Just like the package. Make a general dir with the base-port. And have
> >two or three subdirs with gui-ports.
> >
> >
> >Cya, Han.
>
--
Tony Lambiris [methodic@slartibartfast.angrypacket.com]
http://www.openbsd.org && http://www.openssh.com
"Anyone who truly understands the power
of UNIX wouldn't use anything else."
|