openbsd-misc
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: using OpenBSD instead of Cisco routers

To: Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>
Subject: Re: using OpenBSD instead of Cisco routers
From: Christopher Hylarides <hylaride@capybara.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:20:38 -0500
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
In-reply-to: <20050322132521.GP20854@diehard.n-r-g.com>; from cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com on Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:24:59PM +0059
References: <20050321205554.34952.qmail@web40910.mail.yahoo.com> <424008F5.8090208@meph.net> <20050322132521.GP20854@diehard.n-r-g.com>
Sender: owner-misc@openbsd.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:24:59PM +0059, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> 
> ISIS -- probably the easiest routing protocol there is.
> This may be true but have you ever tried to read the RFC describing ISIS?
> It's probably the worst RFC I ever tried to reed. I think I mentioned it
> before on this listr: If somebody comes up with a good comprehensible
> document of the ISIS protocol I will sit down and write a daemon for
> OpenBSD. I just don't have the time to figure out how to parse a ITU
> document.

ISIS is not an RFC, it's a protocol created by OSI (or ISO or whatever language 
their acronym is in).  Unless somebody subsequently created an RFC for it, it 
is not under the IETF's realm.  Although ISIS is a nice protocol, it wasn't 
designed specifically with IP in mind.  Though ISIS works well, OSPF is also a 
clean protocol, and I believe that RFCs are much easier to obtain than OSI 
specs.  Though some ISPs use ISIS because there was a gap for a good IGP until 
OSPF came along (RIP being the only alternative).  Few places implement new 
ISIS networks anymore.
 
Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.

As overated as MPLS is, I'd rather see it than ISIS come first.
 
--
Chris

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>